School Year Ends Early For Quinn

Tonight at its March 26 business meeting, the Methacton School Board announced that they had held several executive sessions in February and March to review material gathered by the special investigative counsel hired November 1 2012  to look into allegations of an inappropriate relationship between superintendent Timothy Quinn and Director of Curriculum, Diane Barrie. Those allegations first came to light via a Fox 29 news report and which I’ve written about previously.   

The special investigative team spent more than 4 months gathering evidence. My understanding is that hearings for each to review the findings were to have been conducted in late February or this month, but that both elected to resign before those hearings could be held. Had they gone forward as scheduled, a report of the results would have been subject to public disclosure, which they presumably wanted to avoid.

In light of the findings of that investigation and the tendered resignations, the Board voted 8 to 0 (board member Cathy Barone was absent) to accept them.

Not all the legal bills are in, but the cost of this investigation is estimated to be over $20,000 at this point.  

Quinn’s tenure at Methacton since he arrived in 2008 was tumultuous. Many I’ve talked to while campaigning for office believed Quinn received the support of former school board president Jim Van Horn and the board at that time primarily because he supported the construction of the controversial 5/6 school, Skyview, circa 2007-2008 (completed in 2010) and which I understand sits half-empty today (while we don’t start paying down principal on the construction costs til 2018). Since then, Quinn was in the middle of the continuing debates over the need for, and cost of, new turf fields and lights for the football field. The prom drinking scandal two years ago, an unexpected change to the dress code and arrest of a teacher for having an inappropriate relationship with a student all occurred during his tenure.

Quinn’s original four year contract would have expired in 2012, but was renewed early in July 2010 for another five years, scheduled to end in August 2015. The Board indicated it would pay out both Quinn and Barrie’s contracts only through the end of this year.  As far as I am aware, Barrie has not been offered the position she applied for at the Intermediate Unit; I don't know if that has been filled or if it remains open.

No one was appointed acting superintendent. With a primary election coming in less than 8 weeks, perhaps the current board wants to await its outcome before deciding when to move forward with naming an acting superintendent or a replacement.

While Quinn undeniably had his strengths and accomplishments during his time at Methacton, it is unfortunate that his unceremonious departure and the reason behind it is likely to be what he is most remembered for.  

The Fox 29 update on this topic appears here:

http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/21802038/methacton-school-dist-superintendent-resigns

 

 

Not Your "Average Joe"

At the October 7 Board of Supervisors meeting, the supervisors came to final agreement on a new contract for our township manager, Joe Dunbar. Supervisors Chris DiPaolo and Don Thomas were appointed back in March of this year to conduct negotiations with Joe, but it is my understanding that it took them until August to even begin the process. 

Conscious of the financial limitations that the Township and its residents are facing, Joe offered to take no increase for 2011 and, as reported in the Times Herald, asked for a three-year contract with no additional benefits. I was a supervisor when Joe's original five-year contract, which expired Sept. 1, was negotiated. The original contract had a provision for accrued comp time above 90 hours per pay period, to be payable only upon termination, resignation, or retirement. Otherwise, it would go unpaid. This is a fairly standard option in employment agreements for executive personnel.

This new contract they came up with was a bit different. What's perplexing to me is this: why would Chris, who I understand was the lead negotiator, present a contract to his fellow Board members that calls for a payout of the comp time now, especially in these tight economic times?

Chris ultimately voted against the final version of the contract he negotiated. Now, I may be biased, since I've negotiated all kinds of contracts with all kinds of entities as a large part of my job for more than fifteen  years, but for Chris to arrive at a set of terms and conditions that he felt comfortable enough presenting to the Board and having their solicitor put in writing, only to then turn around and vote against it, makes it patently obvious to me that either Chris isn't a very good negotiator or he's running for re-election next year and wanted to be seen as not voting for any expenditures.  Or, quite possibly, both. 

He's quoted in the paper, citing the contract's provisions as 'too expensive'.  Was he intentionally trying to overstate the value of the contract to bolster his position? Maybe Chris can explain his logic at the next BOS meeting, but it seems like posturing to me.

I happen to think Joe is worth every penny in his contract. He's very effective, a proactive, big picture thinker who's also good with detail, and a class act who knows how to get the best out of staff. Ultimately, the buck stops with him when something goes wrong and he accepts responsibility, as a good manager should, whenever there's a problem. He has earned the loyalty and respect of staff as a result. He's also earned the respect of local municipal officials, business leaders and governmental agencies. As an example, earlier this year, Joe was the recipient of the "Excellence in Public Service" award from the Montgomery County Chamber of Commerce. Montco Chamber of Commerce Spring 2010 newsletter

I can personally attest to the fact that the Township gets much more from Joe than just what he's obligated to do. During my time as a supervisor, it was obvious to me that he goes above and beyond on a regular basis. It wasn't unusual to get a phone call from him at night, early in the morning or on weekends.

I'm glad he'll be with us for another three years. He'll have served longer than any other Lower Providence Township manager, and longevity and stability can go a long way toward a municipality maintaining a favorable credit/bond rating. But, in my eyes, that's the least of the reasons his position with the Township is a good thing. Kudos to the BOS for getting the deal done, with or without Chris on board.