Upper Providence resident Patricia Stiefel’s comment, above,
captures the essence of the dispute between Upper Providence and Lower
Providence Townships over the regional sewer authority’s (LPVRSA’s) plans to
place a middle interceptor along the Perkiomen creek, which I and others have written about at length previously. At the end of the day, what’s more important:
someone’s view from their kitchen window, or the very existence of a home
that’s been in someone’s family for well over half a century and which they’ve
personally owned for over 25 years?
Last Thursday (9/12/13) another routine regional sewer
authority (LPVRSA) meeting was on the calendar; I wasn’t going to attend since
I had other plans. However, when I discovered that Frank and Patricia Stiefel –
the Upper Providence residents whose home would be directly affected if the
middle interceptor is placed on that side of the Perkiomen creek – would be
attending, I knew I had to be there.
Since the Stiefel’s – and their home’s - very existence has been denied by some on the LP side of the issue, and their opinion of the project and the impact it will have on them grossly misrepresented or ignored by the same LP contingent, I’ve been trying to get the Stiefels to speak publicly about their position for months. As they are very private people who just want to be left alone, the Steifels were reluctant to wade into the fray. Finally, they realized that with all the misrepresentations and smears being perpetrated by their counterparts across the creek, they needed to come forward before it’s too late.
It’s especially necessary given that LP hired a public
relations firm some months ago to help move the needle on the issue for LP, so
those neighbors, including mouthpiece Cathy Beyers, who has written numerous
emotion-laden but fact-light missives relating the purported impact to her and
her neighbors, have that working in their favor. Upper
Providence does not spend tax dollars on lobbyists for special interests in
Harrisburg, so the Stiefels recognized that this too works against them and
forced their hand to, forgive the pun, ‘pipe up’.
The last public LPVRSA meeting resulted in LP Democrat
Supervisor candidate Jim Donohue disrupting the meeting by attempting to bully
and start a physical fight with UP representative Bob Fieo, spouting
obscenities in the process (video, here). Conspicuous by their absence, Donohue,
Beyers and their usual contingent were not present Thursday night.
LPVRSA solicitor Bob Brandt began the meeting by addressing
what happened at the July 11, 2013 meeting in which Donohue got out of hand. He
mentioned that there is a difference between ‘public meetings’ and ‘public
hearings’ and that ‘public meetings’ are not intended to be a forum for people
to interrogate and harass Board members. He stated that the Board should never
have allowed it to get to that point and Donohue should have been tossed for
going after a Board member. Board chairman Terri Stagliano apologized to Bob Fieo
for not doing more to prevent such an altercation and for not having Donohue
removed for his actions once it occurred. She indicated that she has tried to
give residents such as Beyer and Donohue a lot of leeway since the middle
interceptor project affects them directly, but clearly that is being taken
advantage of, and will not be the Board policy going forward.
Upper Providence Township
supervisor Lisa Mossie was present and in the ‘public comment’ portion of the
meeting, introduced the Stiefels to the Board and indicated that in light of
the many misleading and outright false statements being made by Cathy Beyers
and others in the local press and at local meetings about them and their
position, they wanted the Board to hear from them, in person. Ms. Mossie also
handed out a packet of a selection of the misleading and false statements that
have appeared in various electronic and print media formats, most of which were
authored by Beyer and with which the Stiefels specifically take issue.
The Stiefels addressed the Board directly, giving their address
as 248 Cider Mill Road. Frank Stiefel
said that the sewer lateral already goes through their property and is
presently about 40’ from their house. This time, to install the interceptor
will ‘take their house’, and that this isn’t the case with any other affected
property owner. He said ‘I’m a veteran (Marines)…I fought for my country so
other people could stay in their properties. I wish you people would do the
same for me”.
The LP folks are pushing for the option 3A, which will
necessitate construction easements coming within 5 feet of the Stiefel house
and at least six months of sewage bypass pumping, with a pump on their
property. While the pipe will not go
directly through their house, the construction on the steep slope next to the Steifel
home will destabilize an already eroding bank.
Given the huge fluctuations in rise and fall of the creek during heavy
rain events, one can certainly understand the Steifel’s trepidation regarding
construction so close to their little toehold on the Perkiomen.
Stiefel's house is between Cider Mill Rd and the creek, above, and is next to steep slopes. Homes on the LP side don't come nearly as close to a proposed new trench. |
Patricia Stiefel said that when LPVRSA wanted property from
them they accepted their offer and gave it to them although ‘Fair Market Value’
of $264 for a ¼ acre of land was ‘a joke…elsewhere in Upper Providence an acre goes
for $55,000 or more”. She also said that
this so-called ‘driveway’ the LP folks claim the Stiefels may get out of the project is neither needed nor
wanted as they already have two entrances and exits out of their property. Also, the new interceptor will not benefit the
Stiefels as they have a well. Mrs. Stiefel
said that "We do not hook up to the existing sewer system and will not
be able to hook up to the new one once installed, so while it may benefit ‘the
public’, there is absolutely no benefit to us”. For the Stiefels, placement of
the interceptor on the Upper Providence side of the creek is all downside.
Mr. Stiefel said it’s a shame that ‘some people have to say
crap’ in order to try to make their case, and Mrs. Steifel said (referring to
Cathy Beyer and her family specifically) “We were friends for a long time, but
we no longer speak to any of them” as a result of the dispute and the things
that have been said about them.
Even if you factor in
claimed environmental impacts and consider alleged artifact finds of dubious
value, issues which encompass both
sides of the creek, all things being equal, what’s more important? Someone’s
view or someone’s home?
As we exited the building, Mary Kaczor, one of the LP
residents involved (and sister to Cathy Beyers), who’d arrived late to the
meeting and missed most of the public comment portion of the meeting, ran up to
the Stiefels and confronted them on their way to their car. Clearly caught flat-footed, having never
anticipated that the Stiefels would get involved, Kaczor feigned ignorance
about any of the online comments – several of which she has actually responded
to online herself - and told the
Steifels in front of Ms. Mossie and myself that she ‘had no idea that this was
going to ruin their property’. In a dizzying display of sheer CYA, Kaczor’s
comments ran the gamut from claiming she’s ‘an expert because she’s been to
every meeting and thus knows all about this issue’ to claiming she didn’t know
anything at all when presented with facts that opposed her views, including that
she ‘didn’t have any idea that the pipe was coming through the Stiefel’s property’
AND that she ‘thought they were on board with the pipe going through their
property’.
When none of these arguments gained traction with the
Steifels, Kaczor, apparently assuming that the Steifels were completely
ignorant about the middle interceptor construction project, tried to lure them
to her side by saying that they should all push LPVRSA for a pump station. “Where are they going to put that, Mary?” asked
an incredulous Frank Steifel, who knows that the pump station would be placed
right on his front lawn and would necessitate a condemnation of his entire
property. Those of you who have been
following along at home will remember that up until this past January, this
pump station option was the preferred option of Lower Providence Township and
the LP folks.
Out of options and desperate at this point, Kaczor pulled
out her final ace in the hole: The board
members on the LPVRSA are all “evil” and all of the folks on the creek should
band together and “just stop” this project.
The pipe could just go “somewhere else,” suggested this self-proclaimed
“expert” on the project.
Indeed, for a self-proclaimed ‘expert’ Kaczor didn’t even
know who Lisa Mossie, a party to the dispute, was when she was standing right
in front of her and claimed to have never seen a plan that had lateral going
anywhere near the Stiefel’s home (see plans, above). I wish I had taped the encounter, because it
was utterly ludicrous. I’ve never seen someone vacillate so rapidly between two
extremes - claiming to know everything and claiming to know nothing – in such a
short period of time as I saw from Kaczor that night. Clearly Kaczor and her
ilk aren’t used to a dialogue; they are used to having the soapbox to
themselves, conjuring their own facts and controlling the narrative.
Kaczor complained that the Steifels ‘should have come to
them’ if they had problems with the project;
the Stiefels feel the time for talking has long passed since Beyer &
Co. represented them and their position without their knowledge or
consent.
As the sky opened up and torrents of rain poured down on
both parties who make their home on the water, we all cut the talk short and
departed. Apparently, though, Kaczor wouldn’t let it go, because she showed up
unannounced at the Stiefel’s house later that evening, trying to do damage
control and convince them to meet with ‘the engineer’ Fred Walker. Mr. Walker
may be AN engineer, but he’s not THE LPVRSA engineer; he is LP’s representative
on LPVRSA.
Aside from the central issue at hand – where the interceptor
will be placed – the saddest part is this: two families that have known each
other for decades and grew up together –Frank Stiefel reminisced about how
Cathy and Mary would run through the sewer pipes when they were kids in the 70’s – have been torn
apart because one of the parties has been so utterly consumed by this cause
that they discarded all of that in favor of their own interests. Ultimately, the
cost of this interceptor will be higher than just dollars, turtles and artifacts; it may cost someone’s
home in addition to the long-standing friendship.
The Stiefels may be late in gearing up for war, but they are
nonetheless determined to fight the smear campaign being waged against them, LPVRSA and
their municipality. As Mrs. Steifel told Kaczor, “You are fighting for your view of the creek. I am fighting for a place to put my head at night. We haven’t said anything up
til now, but I will fight you with my last dying breath”.
1 comment:
While I commend you for thinking outside the box, let's look at this realistically.
You're not only talking about building a holding tank but building an entirely new sewage plant. The sewage plant in Oaks is less than 20 years old, isn't it? There's a cost to doing so and it's likely prohibitive.
The LP folks are complaining about sewage running in an underground line that they cannot see. They will never agree to a sewage tank. Plus to solve the problem, it would have to be down in that general vicinity, which presents all of the location problems of a pump station, plus the mechanical and staffing issues that made the pumps station unattractive to begin with, or else we are talking about pumping all that sh!t uphill to store it and release it slowly back down the valley.
Add in the fact that it's highly doubtful Superior Tube (or the Township, or the neighbors in the Evansburg area) would want the noise, smell and liability that comes with such a project on TOP of the TCE in the water there and I don't see how it solves much.
As with any public infrastructure project, sometimes there are no magic answers, and sometimes not everyone is going to be happy. Sometimes you have to go with the lesser of two evils.
Post a Comment